Rendimiento y calidad de tomate injertado bajo déficit hídrico con tratamiento de nanopartículas

Autores/as

  • Rafael Delgado-Martínez Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas image/svg+xml
    • Conceptualization
    • Methodology
    • Supervision
  • Luis Eduardo Tamayo-Ruiz Universidad del Valle de México image/svg+xml
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Methodology
    • Supervision
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Efraín Neri-Ramírez Universidad del Valle de México image/svg+xml
    • Resources
    • Conceptualization
    • Data Curation
    • Validation
  • Héctor Manuel Rodríguez-Morán Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas image/svg+xml
    • Methodology
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Validation
    • Investigation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a13nVI.5267

Palabras clave:

Carotenoides, estrés abiótico, humedad del suelo, portainjerto, sólidos solubles

Resumen

La producción de tomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.) es una actividad hortícola de alta relevancia agroalimentaria; sin embargo, en regiones con escasez de agua su productividad puede verse limitada. El objetivo fue evaluar el crecimiento, rendimiento, eficiencia del uso del agua y calidad del fruto de tomate mediante el uso de injerto y la aplicación foliar de nanopartículas de cobre, bajo condiciones contrastantes de humedad del suelo en invernadero. Se compararon plantas injertadas y no injertadas establecidas en suelo a capacidad de campo y bajo déficit hídrico severo. Se empleó un diseño experimental completamente al azar y las variables de respuesta incluyeron altura de planta, diámetro de tallo, peso promedio de fruto, rendimiento, eficiencia del uso del agua, sólidos solubles totales, licopeno y betacaroteno. Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis de varianza y comparación de medias con la prueba de Tukey (p ≤ 0.05). La disponibilidad de agua en el suelo influyó significativamente sobre la altura de planta, el rendimiento, la eficiencia del uso del agua y el contenido de sólidos solubles totales, observándose mayores rendimientos y eficiencia bajo condiciones de capacidad de campo. La aplicación de nanopartículas de cobre promovió una mayor altura de planta respecto a los demás manejos agronómicos. El peso promedio de fruto y la concentración de carotenoides dependieron de la interacción entre la humedad del suelo y el manejo agronómico. En conjunto, los resultados indican que mantener la humedad cercana a capacidad de campo favorece el potencial productivo y la calidad del cultivo.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Rafael Delgado-Martínez, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas

    Ingeniero agrónomo fitotecnista y maestro en Ciencias Agrícolas y Recursos Naturales, en el área de Mejoramiento Genético y Sanidad Vegetal, por la UAEMéx. Doctor en Ciencias, Programa de Botánica, por el Colegio de Posgraduados. Profesor-investigador de la UAT. Miembro del SNI, nivel I.

  • Luis Eduardo Tamayo-Ruiz, Universidad del Valle de México

    Ingeniero en Desarrollo Sustentable por la Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas. Maestro en Ciencias y Doctor en Ciencias en Sistemas Agropecuarios y Medio Ambiente por la Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. Sus líneas de investigación se centran en el déficit hídrico, el uso de nanopartículas para mitigar los efectos de factores abióticos en cultivos hortícolas y el uso de injertos en la agricultura. Se desempeña como académico de asignatura en la Universidad del Valle de México (UVM) y es miembro del Centro de Investigación, Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico de la UVM.

  • Efraín Neri-Ramírez, Universidad del Valle de México

    Licenciado en Ingeniería Ambiental por la BUAP. Maestro en Estrategias para el Desarrollo Agrícola Regional y doctor en Hidrociencias por el Colegio de Postgraduados. Profesor de tiempo completo en la FIyC-UAT. Miembro del SNI nivel candidato.

Referencias

Afsheen S, Naseer H, Iqbal T, Abrar M, Bashir A, Ijaz M (2020) Synthesis and characterization of metal sulphide nanoparticles to investigate the effect of nanoparticles on germination of soybean and wheat seeds. Materials Chemistry and Physics 252: 123216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123216

Agathokleous E, Feng ZZ, Peñuelas J (2020) Chlorophyll hormesis: Are chlorophylls major components of stress biology in higher plants? Science of the Total Environment 726: 138637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138637

Agbna GHD, Dongli S, Zhipeng L, Elshaikh NA, Guangcheng S, Timm LC (2017) Effects of deficit irrigation and biochar addition on the growth, yield, and quality of tomato. Scientia Horticulturae 222: 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.05.004

Bogale A, Nagle M, Latif S, Aguila M, Müller J (2016) Regulated deficit irrigation and partial root-zone drying irrigation impact bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in two select tomato cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 213: 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.10.029

Burbano E, Vallejo A (2017) Solanum lycopersicum Mill., con expresión del gen sp responsable del crecimiento determinado. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas 11(1): 63–71.

Cantore V, Lechkar O, Karabulut E, Sellami MH, Albrizio R, Boari F, Stellacci AM, Todorovic M (2016) Combined effect of deficit irrigation and strobilurin application on yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of “cherry” tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Agricultural Water Management 167: 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.024

Castilla N (2002) Current situation and future prospects of protected crops in the mediterranean region. Acta Horticulturae 582: 135–147. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.582.11

Catalkaya G, Kahveci D (2019) Optimization of enzyme assisted extraction of lycopene from industrial tomato waste. Separation and Purification Technology 219: 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.006

Chai Q, Gan Y, Zhao C, Xu HL, Waskom RM, Niu Y, Siddique KHM (2016) Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36(1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0338-6

Costa JM, Heuvelink E (2018) Crop production science in horticulture series. In: Heuvelink E (ed) The global tomato industry. 2nd ed. CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780641935.0001

Coyago-Cruz E, Corell M, Moriana A, Hernanz D, Stinco CM, Mapelli-Brahm P, Meléndez-Martínez AJ (2022) Effect of regulated deficit irrigation on commercial quality parameters, carotenoids, phenolics and sugars of the black cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) ‘Sunchocola’. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 105: 104220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104220

Dal A, Dainelli R, Santoni M, Lanini GM, Serio A Di, Zanotti D, Greco A, Ronga D (2025) Impact of different shading conditions on processing tomato yield and quality under organic agrivoltaic systems. Horticulturae 11: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11030319

Díez MJ, Nuez F (2008) Tomato. In: Prohens J, Nuez F (eds) Vegetables II. Springer. pp. 249–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470113554.ch97

Doltu M, Dorin S, Bogoescu M, Tănasă V, Șovărel G, Abdulrazzaq AKHA, Drăghici EM (2019) Effect of grafting on some Romanian tomatoes cultivated in greenhouse. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 24(6): 966–972. https://doi.org/10.25083/rbl/24.6/966.972

Fanciullino AL, Bidel LPR, Urban L (2014) Carotenoid responses to environmental stimuli: integrating redox and carbon controls into a fruit model. Plant, Cell and Environment 37(2): 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12153

Feder A, Chayut N, Gur A, Freiman Z, Tzuri G, Meir A, Saar U, Ohali S, Baumkoler F, Gal-On A, Shnaider Y, Wolf D, Katzir N, Schaffer A, Burger J, Li L, Tadmor Y (2019) The role of carotenogenic metabolic flux in carotenoid accumulation and chromoplast differentiation: Lessons from the melon fruit. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 1250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01250

Hernández-Hernández H, Quiterio-Gutiérrez T, Cadenas-Pliego G, Ortega-Ortiz H, Hernández-Fuentes AD, De La Fuente MC, Valdés-Reyna J, Juárez-Maldonado A (2019) Impact of selenium and copper nanoparticles on yield, antioxidant system, and fruit quality of tomato plants. Plants 8(10): 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8100355

Horváth KZ, Andryei B, Helyes L, Pék Z, Neményi A, Nemeskéri E (2020) Effect of mycorrhizal inoculations on physiological traits and bioactive compounds of tomato under water scarcity in field conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 48(3): 1233–1247. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha48311963

Ibrahim A, Wahb-Allah M, Abdel-Razzak H, Alsadon A (2014) Growth, yield, quality and water use efficiency of grafted tomato plants grown in greenhouse under different irrigation levels. Life Science Journal 11(2): 203–210.

Jahagirdar AS, Shende S, Gade A, Rai M (2019) Bioinspired synthesis of copper nanoparticles and its efficacy on seed viability and seedling growth in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Current Nanoscience 16(2): 246–252. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573413715666190325170054

Jalali K, Nouairi I, Kallala N, M’Sehli W, Zribi K, Mhadhbi H (2018) Germination, seedling growth, and antioxidant activity in four legume (Fabaceae) species under copper sulphate fungicide treatment. Pakistan Journal of Botany 50(4): 1599–1606.

Jenkins T, Cowan J, Rivard CL, Pliakoni ED (2022) Effect of rootstock on ‘Tasti-Lee’ tomato yield and fruit quality in a high tunnel production system. HortScience 57(10): 1235–1241. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci16634-22

Khah EM, Kakava E, Mavromatis A, Chachalis D, Goulas C (2006) Effect of grafting on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in greenhouse and open-field. Journal of Applied Horticulture 8(1): 3–7. https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2006.v08i01.01

Koleška I, Hasanagić D, Todorović V, Murtić S, Maksimović I (2018) Grafting influence on the weight and quality of tomato fruit under salt stress. Annals of Applied Biology 172(2): 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12411

Landa P (2021) Positive effects of metallic nanoparticles on plants: Overview of involved mechanisms. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 161: 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.039

Lares-Michel M, Ezzahra Housni F, Aguilera Cervantes VG, Michel-Nava RM, Bracamontes-Del Toro H, Llanes-Cañedo C, Barragán-Carmona MC (2018) The relationship between consumption, socioeconomic level and reasons of tomato intake in México. Agricultural Sciences 9(7): 777–791. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2018.97055

Lee H, Hong KH, Kwon DH, Cho MC, Lee JG, Hwang I, Ahn YK (2020) Changes of growth and yield by using rootstocks in tomato. Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory 29(4): 456–463. https://doi.org/10.12791/ksbec.2020.29.4.456

Li H, Yang X, Chen H, Cui Q, Yuan G, Han X, Wei C, Zhang Y, Ma J, Zhang X (2018) Water requirement characteristics and the optimal irrigation schedule for the growth, yield, and fruit quality of watermelon under plastic film mulching. Scientia Horticulturae 241: 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.067

Liu J, Hu T, Feng P, Wang L, Yang S (2019) Tomato yield and water use efficiency change with various soil moisture and potassium levels during different growth stages. PLoS ONE 14(3): e0213643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213643

Martí R, Valcárcel M, Roselló S, Cebolla-Cornejo J (2019) Functional and health-promoting properties of tomatoes: It’s not just lycopene. In: Porretta S (ed) Tomato chemistry, industrial processing and product development. The Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788016247-00285

Maureira F, Rajagopalan K, Stöckle CO (2022) Evaluating tomato production in open-field and high-tech greenhouse systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 337: 130459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130459

Medyouni I, Zouaoui R, Rubio E, Serino S, Ben H, Nadia A (2021) Effects of water deficit on leaves and fruit quality during the development period in tomato plant. Food Science and Nutrition 9: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2160

Mosa KA, El-Naggar M, Ramamoorthy K, Alawadhi H, Elnaggar A, Wartanian S, Ibrahim E, Hani H (2018) Copper nanoparticles induced genotoxicity, oxidative stress, and changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD) gene expression in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00872

Nagata M, Yamashita I (1992) Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Journal of the Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology 39(10): 925–928. https://doi.org/10.3136/nskkk1962.39.925

Neocleous D (2010) Yield, nutrients, and antioxidants of tomato in response to grafting and substrate. International Journal of Vegetable Science 16(3): 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260903557452

Nisar N, Li L, Lu S, Khin NC, Pogson BJ (2015) Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Molecular Plant 8(1): 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.007

Ohashi Y, Nakayama N, Saneoka H, Fujita K (2006) Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and stem diameter of soybean plants. Biologia Plantarum 50(1): 138–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-0089-3

Priyanka A, Sujatha KB, Sivakumar T, Rajasree V (2019) Morphological changes in the compatible grafts of tomato cv. PKM 1 with different solanaceous rootstocks. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(3): 2416–2419.

Sibomana IC, Aguyoh JN, Opiyo AM (2013) Water stress affects growth and yield of container grown tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 2(4): 461–466.

Simkin AJ, Kapoor L, Doss CGP, Hofmann TA, Lawson T, Ramamoorthy S (2022) The role of photosynthesis related pigments in light harvesting, photoprotection and enhancement of photosynthetic yield in planta. Photosynthesis Research 152(1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00892-6

Singh D, Nath K, Sharma YK (2007) Response of wheat seed germination and seedling growth under copper stress. Journal of Environmental Biology 28(2 SUPPL.): 409–414.

Soare R, Dinu M, Babeanu C (2018) The effect of using grafted seedlings on the yield and quality of tomatoes grown in greenhouses. Horticultural Science 45(2): 76–82. https://doi.org/10.17221/214/2016-HORTSCI

Sora D, Doltu M, Drăghici EM, Bogoescu MI (2019) Effect of grafting on tomato fruit quality. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 47(4): 1246–1251. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47411719

Takács S, Pék Z, Csányi D, Daood HG, Szuvandzsiev P, Palotás G, Helyes L (2020) Influence of water stress levels on the yield and lycopene content of tomato. Water 12(8): 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/W12082165

Toscano S, Ferrante A, Romano D (2019) Response of mediterranean ornamental plants to drought stress. Horticulturae 5(1): 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5010006

Wang J, Li Y, Niu W (2020) Deficit alternate drip irrigation increased root-soil-plant interaction, tomato yield, and quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(3): 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030781

Watkins JL, Pogson BJ (2020) Prospects for carotenoid biofortification targeting retention and catabolism. Trends in Plant Science 25(5): 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.021

Descargas

Publicado

2026-08-25

Cómo citar

Delgado-Martínez, R., Tamayo-Ruiz, L. E., Neri-Ramírez, E., & Rodríguez-Morán, H. M. (2026). Rendimiento y calidad de tomate injertado bajo déficit hídrico con tratamiento de nanopartículas. Ecosistemas Y Recursos Agropecuarios, 13(VI). https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a13nVI.5267