Forage strategies of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) in northeastern Mexico

Authors

  • Fernando Isaac Gastelum-Mendoza Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
  • Eloy Alejandro Lozano-Cavazos Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro
  • Fernando Noel González-Saldívar Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
  • José Isidro Uvalle-Sauceda Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
  • Guillermo Romero-Figueroa Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
  • Ricardo Serna-Lagunes Unidad de Manejo y Conservación de Recursos Genéticos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, región Orizaba - Córdoba, Universidad Veracruzana.
  • Luis Antonio Tarango-Arámbula Posgrado en Innovación en Manejo de Recursos Naturales, Campus San Luis Potosí, Colegio de Postgraduados
  • César Martín Cantú-Ayala Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a11n1.3921

Keywords:

Shrubberies, Canfield, scrub, grasses, selection

Abstract

Understanding the dietary needs is important for the conservation of the bighorn sheep. The objective was to identify the diet selection in Coahuila, Mexico. The research was conducted at the Rancho San Juan Wildlife Management Unit (UMA), Monclova municipality, from August 2018 to October 2019. Forage availability was assessed using 18 Canfield transects. Diet composition was estimated through microhistology on 280 fecal samples, and diet and forage diversity were assessed using the Shannon index. Cluster and principal component analyses (PCA) were applied to analyze similarity in consumption across different species and seasonal influences. Shrubs were the most available (48%). A total of 50 species and 14 families were identified in the diet, with shrubs (49.2%) and grasses (17.21%) being predominant. Tiquilia canescens, Gymnosperma glutinosum, Opuntia rufida, Medicago sativa, and Erioneuron pulchellum were the most consumed species. The bighorn sheep consumed tree and shrub species proportionally (1.1 and 1.02, respectively), preferred herbaceous plants in spring (2.24) and autumn (15.28), and grasses in spring (6.10), except in summer (0.83) when they avoided succulents. PCA revealed that the first two components explained 96.05% of the correlation between species consumption frequencies and their biological forms. Cluster analysis grouped five forage consumption categories. Conserving shrub species, which form the basis of the bighorn sheep's diet, grasses—its preference—and succulents as buffering elements, is essential.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Álvarez-Cárdenas S, Lee R, Gallina-Tessaro P, Castellanos A (2005) Desert bighorn sheep distribution, abundance, and conservation estatus in Sierra el Mechudo, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 48: 72.

Barnes TG, Blankenship LT, Varner LW, Gallagher JF (1991) Digestibility of guajillo for white-tailed deer. Journal of Range Management 44: 606-610. https://eastfoundation.net/media/wrzjwbol/guajillo-rem-article.pdf

Bautista-De-Luna M S, Tarango-Arámbula LA, Mendoza-Martínez G, Oropeza GO, Martínez-Montoya JF, Ugalde-Lezama S, Lánderos-Sánchez C (2022) Requerimientos y balance nutricional de fósforo y proteína cruda en plantas preferidas por el borrego cimarrón (Ovis canadensis mexicana). Revista Chapingo Serie Zonas Áridas 21(1): 3-12. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsza.2021.21.1

Bolen EG, Robinson WL (2002) Wildlife Ecology and Management. 5th Edition. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, USA. 605p.

Buchalski MR, Sacks BN, Gille DA, Penedo MCT, Ernest HB, Morrison SA, Boyce WM (2016) Phylogeographic and population genetic structure of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in North American deserts. Journal of Mammalogy 97(3): 823-838. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw011.

Cain III JW, Krausman PR, Rosenstock SS, Turner JC (2006). Mechanisms of thermoregulation and water balance in desert ungulates. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(3): 570-581. https://10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[570:MOTAWB]2.0.CO;2.

Canfield RH (1941) Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation. Southwestern Forest and Range Vegetation. Journal of Forestry 39(4): 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/39.4.388.

Chao A, Lee SM (1992) Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. Journal of American Statistical Association 417: 210-217. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290471.

Creeden PJ, Graham VK (1997) Reproduction, survival, and lion predation in the Black Ridge Colorado National Monument desert bighorn herd. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 41: 37-43.

Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife. The Annals of Statistics 7(1): 1-26.

Espinosa AT, Sandoval A, Contreras A (2006) Historical distribution of desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) in Coahuila, Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 51(2): 282-288.

Estrada-Castillón E, Villarreal-Quintanilla JA, Jurado E (2005) Leguminosas del norte del estado de Nuevo León, México. Acta Botánica Mexicana 73: 1-18. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/abm/n73/n73a1.pdf

Foroughbakhch R, Hernández PJ, Alvarado VM, Céspedes CE, Rocha EA, Cárdenas AM (2009) Leaf biomass determination on woody shrub species in semiarid zones. Agroforestry Systems 77: 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9194-6.

Fracker SB, Brichle JA (1944) Measuring the local distribution of Ribes. Ecology 25: 283-303.

Fulbright TE, Ortega JA (2006) White-tailed deer habitat: ecology and management in rangelands. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas, EUA. 265p.

Gallina-Tessaro S, Hernández-Huerta A, Delfín-Alfonso CA, González-Gallina A (2009) Unidades para la conservación, manejo y aprovechamiento sustentable de la vida silvestre en México (UMA). Retos para su correcto funcionamiento. Investigación Ambiental 1(2): 143-152.

García E (2004) Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Serie Libros, Núm. 6. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México. 97p.

García-Hernández J, Jurado-Ybarra E (2008) Caracterización del matorral submontano con condiciones prístinas en Linares N. L., México. Ra Ximhai 14(1): 1–21.

Gastelum-Mendoza FI, Serna-Lagunes R, Salazar-Ortiz J, Cantú-Ayala CM, González-Saldívar FN (2019) Dieta de herbívoros: técnica, importancia e implicaciones en el manejo de fauna silvestre. Agroproductividad 12(4): 17–23. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v0i0.391.

Gastelum-Mendoza FI, Cantú- Ayala CM, Uvalle-Suaceda JI, Lozano-Cavazos EA, Serna-Lagunes JI, González-Saldívar FN (2020) Importancia del matorral desértico micrófilo para el venado cola blanca (Odocoileus virginianus Mearns, 1898) en Coahuila. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 11: 136-156. https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v11i62.747.

Gastelum-Mendoza FI, Tarango-Arámbula LA, Olmos-Oropeza G, Palacio-Núñez J, Valdez-Zamudio D, Noriega-Valdez R (2021) Diet and sexual segregation of the bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana Merriam) in Sonora, Mexico. Agroproductividad 14(6): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v14i6.2043.

Guerrero-Cárdenas I, Gallina S, Corcuera P, Álvarez-Cárdenas S, Ramírez-Orduña R (2016) Diet composition and selection of the bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in Sierra El Mechudo, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Therya 7(3): 423-437. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-16-394.

Guerrero-Cárdenas I, Álvarez-Cárdenas S, Gallina S, Corcuera P, Ramírez-Orduña R, Tovar-Zamora I (2018) Variación estacional del contenido nutricional de la dieta del borrego cimarrón (Ovis canadensis weemsi), en Baja California Sur, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (N.S.) 34(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2018.3412113.

Hoffman PC, Combs D (2004) Use of digestibility of NDF in the formulation of rations. Focus on Forage 6(3): 1−5. https://fyi.extension.wisc.edu/forage/files/2014/01/NDFD04-FOF.pdf. Fecha de consulta: 10 de abril de 2023.

Holechek JL, Vavra M, Pieper R (1982) Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: A review. Journal of Range Management 35: 309-315.

Lozano-Cavazos EA, Gastelum-Mendoza FI, Reséndiz-Dávila L, Romero-Figueroa G, González-Saldívar F N, Uvalle-Sauceda JI (2020) Composición de la dieta del venado cola blanca (Odocoileus virginianus texanus Mearns) identificada en contenido ruminal en Coahuila, México. Agroproductividad 13: 49-54. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.vi.1702.

Martínez RG, Galindo ME (2001) Feeding habits of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis cremnobates) in San Pedro Martir Sierra, Baja California, Mexico. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 45: 111-123.

Mazaika R, Krausman PR, Etchberger RC (1992) Nutritional carrying capacity of desert bighorn sheep habitat in the Pusch Ridge Wilderness, Arizona. Southwestern Naturalist 37: 372-378.

McKinney S, Smith TW (2007) Diets of adults and lambs of desert bighorn sheep during years of varying rainfall in central Arizona. The Southwestern Naturalist 52(4): 520-527.

Memmott KL, Anderson VJ, Fugal R (2011) Seasonal dynamics of forage shrub nutrients. Rangelands 6: 12-16. https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-501X-33.6.12.

Miller GD, Gaud WS (1989) Composition and variability of desert bighorn diets. Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 597-606. https://doi.org/10.2307/3809182.

Miranda F, Hernández-X E (1963) Los tipos de vegetación de México y su clasificación. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 28: 29-179. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1084.

Nefzaoui A, Louhaichi M, Ben-Salem H (2014) Cactus as a tool to mitigate drought and to combat desertification. Journal of Arid Land Studies 24(1): 121-124.

O'Farril G, Medellín RA, Matter SF, Cameron GN (2018) Habitat use and diet of desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) and endemic mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus nelsonii) on Tiburon Island, Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 63(4): 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909-63-4-225.

Ramírez-Lozano RG (2012) Alimentación del venado cola blanca: biología y ecología nutricional. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Alimentos, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. San Nicolas de los Garza, Nuevo León, México. 354p.

SEMARNAT (2010) Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010. Protección ambiental, especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres, categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio. Lista de especies en riesgo. Segunda sección. Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ciudad de México, México. 789p. https://www.profepa.gob.mx/innovaportal/file/435/1/NOM_059_SEMARNAT_2010.pdf. Fecha de consulta: 25 de febrero de 2023.

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.

Sparks DR, Malechek JC (1968) Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscopic technique. Journal of Range Management 21(4): 264.

Tarango LA, Krausman PR, Valdez R, Katting RM (2002) Research observation: desert bighorn sheep diets in north-western Sonora, Mexico. Journal of Range Management 55(6): 530-534. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003995.

Turner JC, Weaver RA (1980) Water. In: Monson G, Sumner L (eds) The desert bighorn: Its life history, ecology, and management. University of Arizona Press. Tucson, EUA. pp. 100-112.

Wehausen JD, Ramey RR (2000) Cranial morphometric and evolutionary relationships in the northern range of Ovis canadensis. Journal of Mammalogy 81(1): 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0145:CMAERI>2.0.CO;2.

Whiting JC, Bowyer RT, Flinders JT (2009) Annual use of water sources by reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis canadensis: effects of season and drought. Acta Theriologica 54: 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03193168.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-05

Issue

Section

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE

How to Cite

Gastelum-Mendoza, F. I., Lozano-Cavazos, E. A., González-Saldívar, F. N., Uvalle-Sauceda, J. I., Romero-Figueroa, G., Serna-Lagunes, R., Tarango-Arámbula, L. A., & Cantú-Ayala, C. M. (2024). Forage strategies of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis mexicana) in northeastern Mexico. Ecosistemas Y Recursos Agropecuarios, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a11n1.3921

Similar Articles

41-50 of 70

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)