Ruminal microbiome and productive response of lambs fed shrimp shell meal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a11n2.4025Keywords:
Nutrition, microbiology, sheep, chitin, byproductsAbstract
The fishing industry produces byproducts that accumulate and cause environmental pollution problems; however, could be used as an alternative source of nutrients in ruminants. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the response over ruminal microbiome, apparent digestibility and productivity of Katahdin lambs fed different levels of shrimp shell meal (HCC). Four male lambs with live weight of 22 ± 2.5 kg were assigned in a repeated Latin square design (4 animals x 4 treatments). The animals were assigned for 16 days per period to diets with 0, 5, 10 and 20 g 100 g DM of HCC, the treatments were: HCC0, HCC5, HCC10 and HCC20, respectively. The greatest daily weight gain was found in the HCC5 treatment (P ≤ 0.05). However, the highest dry matter intake was observed in animals with the HCC20 diet (P ≤ 0.05). In the apparent digestibility of the dry matter there was no difference between treatments (P > 0.05), neither in the concentration of total bacteria (P > 0.05), while the concentration of cellulolytic bacteria and chitin-degrading bacteria was higher in the animals from HCC20 treatment (P ≤ 0.05). The results indicate an adaptation of the ruminal microbiome to high doses of HCC, therefore, HCC can be used in diets for sheep without effect on rumen metabolism and microbial, nutrient digestibility and animal performance.
Downloads
References
AOAC (2012) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis 19th ed. In: AOAC International, Latimer GW (eds). Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Araujo APC, Venturelli BC, Santos MCB, Gardinal R, Cônsolo NRB, Calomeni GD, Freitas JE, Barletta RV, Gandra JR, Paiva PG, Rennó FP (2015) Chitosan affects total nutrient digestion and ruminal fermentation in Nellore steers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 206: 114–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.05.016
Belanche A, Ramos ME, Newbold JC (2015) In vitro screening of natural feed additives from crustaceans, diatoms, seaweeds and plant extracts to manipulate rumen fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96: 3069–3078. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7481
Castillo LE, Domínguez OM (2019) Factores que afectan la composición microbiana ruminal y métodos para determinar el rendimiento de la proteína microbiana. Revisión. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias 10 (1): 120-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v10i1.4547
Cobos MA, Pérez SM, Piloni MJ, Gonzáles SS, Barcena JR (2007) Evaluation of diets containing shrimp Shell waste and an inoculum of Streptococcus milleri on rumen bacteria and performance of lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 132 (3-4): 324-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.019
CONAFAB (2020) La industria alimentaria animal de México 2020. Consejo Nacional de Fabricantes de Alimentos Balanceados y de la Nutrición Animal, A. C. México. 100p.
CONAGUA (2021) Información Estadística Climatológica. Comisión Nacional de Agua. https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/. Fecha de consulta: 10 de octubre 2022.
Curzaynz LKR, Bárcena GJR, Sánchez del RC, Escobar EJC, Rivas MMI, Santillán GEA, Portela DDF, Flores SEJ (2019) Effect of dried distillers grains (DDGS) on diet digestibility, growth performance, and carcass characteristics in Creole wool lambs fed finishing diets. South African Journal of Animal Science 49 (1): 56-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i1
FAO (2018) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/I9540EN. Fecha de consulta: 08 de diciembre de 2023.
Ferraz-de-Arruda L, Borghesi R, Oetterer M (2007) Use of fish waste as silage - A review. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 50 (5): 879-886. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132007000500016
Goiri I, Garcia RA, Oregui LM (2009a) Effect of chitosans on in vitro rumen digestion and fermentation of maize silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 148: 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.04.007
Goiri I, Garcia RA, Oregui LM (2009b) Effect of chitosan on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation using the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Animal Feed Science and Technology 152: 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.04.005
Hamed I, Özogul F y Regenstein JM (2016) Industrial applications of crustacean by-products (chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides): A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 48(1): 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.007
Ley-de Coss A, Bárcena GJR, Guerra MCE, Montañez VOD, Pérez LS, Barrientos NE, Bran RAA, Escobar EJC (2023) Síntesis de proteína mediante la fermentación de la caña de azúcar adicionada con urea y un cultivo ácido láctico. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú 34(1): e22993 https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v34i1.22993.
Ley-de Coss A, Guerra MCE, Montañez VO, Guevara HF, Pinto RR, Reyes GJ (2018) In vitro production of gas methane by tropical grasses. Revista MVZ Córdoba 23(3): 6788-6798. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1368
Mao X, Guo N, Sun J, Xue C (2017) Comprehensive utilization of shrimp waste based on biotechnological methods: A review, Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 814-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.042
Nicholson MJ, Hutcheson DP (1996) Fish meal and crab meal as protein sources for growing lambs. Small Ruminant Research 23(3): 207-213.
NRC (2007) Nutrient requirements of small ruminants, sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids (8th Edition). National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA. pp. 159-160. https://doi.org/10.17226/11654
Pattanaik SS, Sawant PB, Xavier KM, Dube K, Srivastava PP, Dhanabalan V, Chadha NK (2020) Characterization of carotenoprotein from different shrimp shell waste for possible use as supplementary nutritive feed ingredient in animal diets. Aquaculture 515(1): 734-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734594
Rhoades J, Roller S (2000) Antimicrobial actions of degraded and native chitosan against spoilage organisms in laboratory media and foods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology Journal 66 (1): 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.1.80-86.2000
Resendiz CV, Hernández O, Guerrero I, Gallegos J, Martínez PA, Sánchez C (2013) Engorda de corderos Pelibuey con diferente nivel de alfalfa en la dieta. Archivos de Zootecnia 62 (239): 457-467. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922013000300014
Salinas CJJ, Pérez JA, Rosales JA, Hernández EA, La OO (2013) Efecto de niveles crecientes de pulido de arroz en la degradabilidad ruminal de materia seca y comportamiento productivo de ovinos en engorde. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola. 47 (4): https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=193029815008
SAS (2011) Statistical Analysis System User’s Guide. SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC. USA. 1 112p.
Sudarshan NR, Hoover DG, Knorr D (1992) Antibacterial action of chitosan. Food Biotechnology 6 (3): 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905439209549838
Van-Keulen J, Young BA (1977) Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science 44(2): 282–287. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.442282x
Van-Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstharch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74 (10): 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Velásquez VR, Esquivel MU, Montero CL, Ku VJ (2012) Engorda de corderos Pelibuey con ensilaje de pulpa de naranja Citrus sinensis L. en jaulas elevadas. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal 5 (1): 67-71. https://revistas.ut.edu.co/index.php/ciencianimal/article/view/127
Velez SA, Allen JC, Keery CM, Adkinson RW (1991) Evaluation of crab and crawfish waste meals as protein sources for growing dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 74(1): 234-242. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78165-4
Zanferari F, Vendramini THA, Rentas MF, Gardinal R, Calomeni GD, Mesquita LG, Takiya CS, Rennó FP (2018) Effects of chitosan and whole raw soybeans on ruminal fermentation and bacterial populations, and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101 (2): 10939-10952. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14675
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Aviso de copyright
Los autores que se envían a esta revista aceptan los siguientes términos:
una. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho a ser la primera publicación del trabajo con una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
B. Los autores pueden establecer acuerdos complementarios separados para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en la revista (por ejemplo, en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
C. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir su trabajo electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos, así como a una cita más temprana y más extensa del trabajo publicado. (Consulte El efecto del acceso abierto).
